Showing posts with label citizens united. Show all posts
Showing posts with label citizens united. Show all posts

Sunday, March 11, 2012

Why America is No Longer a Democratic Republic


Based on an editorial by David Model, posted at OpEdNews
Cited here are quotations from David Model, a college professor, author, and public speaker.. They are excerpts from his recent editorial titled Media Circus Obsession: Obfuscating the Real Deficiencies of U.S. Democracy, In addition to the statements below, Mr. Model presents what he sees as thirteen defects in our government that keep America from being a democracy.Aside from his list of thirteen defects, these are the comments I see as being of greatest interest to Americans who dread the erosion of democracy in America.
When commenting on the impact of elections on democratic ideals, it is necessary to look beneath the symptoms and identify the real problems.”
Barnum and Bailey would turn green with envy at the circus masquerading as an electoral campaign currently in the United States.”
Electioneering spectacles are both artificial and superficial but are really just a symptom of the underlying infringements of democratic ideals.”
United States, Britain and Canada are the only three democracies that have not implemented some variation of proportional representation but have clung to the First-Past-The-Post system, a majoritarian system, in which only a plurality is needed in each voting district to determine the outcome.”
.”.. it (is) virtually impossible for smaller parties to gain any ground in the elected chambers of government. ”
.”..the Electoral College ... enhances the possibility of the winner having fewer popular votes than the loser.”
American election campaigns are incapable of informing the public about the real stances of candidates on all the issues and revealing the true character and integrity of the candidates.”
In many European countries paid advertising has been banned due to the overriding manipulative nature of a thirty second ad designed by public relations and advertising experts who are only interested in selling a product rather than informing the public.”
Many democracies have also banned donations by any groups such as corporations and unions …”
... the ideal method for funding elections would be based on a fair formula by which the government would either provide all the money or a balanced combination of government funding and individual donations with strict limits.”
In the U.S., there is a two party system in which both parties are beholden to corporate donors …”
In 2011, a total of $3.3 billion was spent on lobbying by 12,633 lobbyists translating into $6,168,000 spent on each member of the House and Senate on average and 23.6 lobbyists per each member of both Houses.”
In 2012, many pundits are predicting a total expenditure of $5 billion for all campaigns, the major source of which are wealthy benefactors or corporations.
Lobbying virtually destroys political equality in the United States thereby undermining the principle of "by the people, for the people" and "dedicated to the principle that all men are created equal.”
It is impossible to govern with only the public interest in mind when candidates are beholden to the people who funded their victory.”
As for ordinary citizens, they may be able to meet with their member of Congress or Senate but the extent of their influence is often minimal.”
The bailout during the financial crises ignored those who suffered the most, namely those who lost their jobs, the poor and those who lost their homes.”
Leadership in Congress has been accorded too much power which can be used to serve ideological ends rather than the public interest.”
In the United States, Supreme Court appointments are tainted by ideological considerations.   The Citizens United and the Florida Recount cases demonstrate the role of ideology in the Court's judgments.”
.”.. the criminalization of dissent and militarization of the police have resulted in a multiplicity of violations of civil and legal rights not to mention the First Amendment.”
Corporate ownership and advertising and the symbiotic relation between big corporations and the government have reduced the media to stenographers of power.”
I hope the items quoted here will prompt you to read Mr. Model's entire editorial on the subject. And, of course, you will have to read his full statement to review the thirteen defects he sees in our government today.

Friday, January 6, 2012

The "Saving American Democracy" Amendment


Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont has proposed legislation to pass a Constitutional amendment to address the problem of huge money sources in electoral politics. A complete copy of the amendment can be found here.
At his site, Bernie Sanders says that his amendment would stipulate that:
  1. Corporations are not persons with constitutional rights equal to real people.
  2. Corporations are subject to regulation by the people.
  3. Corporations may not make campaign contributions or any election expenditures.
  4. Congress and states have the power to regulate campaign finances.
However, this amendment and others like it, would only undo the Citizens United ruling and leave political corruption at the same unacceptable level it was at before the Supreme Court weighed in with its opinion.  My major problems with this legislation lie in the following:
  1. It is primarily aimed only at reversing the Citizens United ruling.
  2. It restricts only for-profit corporations and limited liability entities, but not non-profit organizations
  3. It would not get money out of politics.
  4. Rather, it would just get for-profit entities out of elections..
  5. It says that corporations would be subject to regulation by the people, but provides for this to be done through their elected representatives. This doesn't even seem to be a change.
  6. When it comes to not making “campaign contributions or any election expenditures, I can see the possibility of loopholes that corporations could use to get around this provision.
  7. The amendment leaves it up to Congress and the states to pass legislation to enact this amendment. They already have the power to do this. We've seen what they have done thus far, and, while they might be convinced to pass an amendment to reverse the Citizens United ruling, it is not likely that they will enact any major controls on other gifts of money, goods, or services.
This particular amendment appears to be somewhat like tossing a bone to a barking dog just to quiet him and keep him from attacking. If it also distracts the public from the fact that it doesn't even address the issue of getting money out of politics, all the better for the politicians. There is no mention of restricting lobbying, so lobbyists could still feel free to contribute money, goods, or services and bill them to the corporations they represent as business expenses or bury the in their consulting fees.
In my opinion, this is just a baby step in the right direction, when we urgently need a giant leap.